Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Luhn et al
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Peter James Luhn, Corbin Jerrett Poirier and Average Joes, LLC
Case Number: 2:2009cv03491
Filed: December 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/22/11 ORDERING that pltf's counsel pay sanctions in the amount of $250.00 for his failure to file a response to the order to show cause filed on May 31, 2011; the sum is to be paid personally by pltf's counsel within 14 days; the 32 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED as to counsel for defendants/third-party plaintiffs and third-party defendant. (Michel, G)
May 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/27/11 ORDERING the parties to SHOW CAUSE within 14 days of the entry of this order why sanctions of $250.00 per party should not be imposed against counsel and/or the parties for their failure to comply with the 31 ORDER. (Meuleman, A)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/14/11. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 5/23/2011. Discovery due by 5/2/2011. Dispositive Motions heard by 08/24/2011, Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/12/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 11/28/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Williams, D) Modified on 2/14/2011 (Williams, D).
June 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/21/2010 GRANTING 21 Stipulation For Leave to Amend Third Party Complaint. (Motion to Amend 20 Terminated). (Krueger, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Luhn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Peter Riley, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter James Luhn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corbin Jerrett Poirier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Average Joes, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?