Davis v. Junious
| Marquis M. Davis |
| Maurice Junious |
| 2:2009cv03510 |
| December 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/28/12 ORDERING that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT 37 otion for an extension of time is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly.(Matson, R) Modified on 9/28/2012 (Matson, R).
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/01/12 ordering petitioner's request to supplement his petition is granted. Respondents are granted 30 days from the date of this order to respond to the supplemental petition, if necessary. If respondents do not file supplemental briefing during this time, the action will stand submitted for decision. The court's 09/15/11 order to show cause is discharged. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/15/11 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, respondent shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his failure to comply with the court order, and shall either file or seek an extension of time to file an answer or motion.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/20/10 ordering the clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's 02/01/10 amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus with any and all attachmen ts on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General for the State of California. The clerk of the court shall also serve on the Attorney General the consent form used in this court. Respondent shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to petitioner's request for a stay within 30 days of the date of this order. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and serve within 14 days thereafter. The clerk of the court shall terminate docket number 8 , petitioner's motion for status report and request for ruling on stay and abeyance. (cc: Michael Farrell, Attorney General) (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davis v. Junious | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marquis M. Davis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Maurice Junious | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
