United States of America et al v. Shadley
Petitioner: United States of America and Charles Duff
Respondent: Linda P. Shadley
Case Number: 2:2009mc00080
Filed: August 31, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/20/2010 ORDERING that petitioners' 28 petition to hold respondent in contempt be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. Petitioners are given twenty-one (21) days to request reconsideration of this Order. (Duong, D)
June 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/17/2010 re 28 ORDERING that Linda P. Shadley to appear before United States District Judge William B. Shubb at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, on Monday, July 19, 2010, at 2:00 o'clock p.m. and that respondent show cause as follows: Why respondent, Linda P. Shadley, should not be held in civil contempt of this Court for her failure to comply with the Orders filed on February 24, 2010 and May 13, 2010, directing respondent to comply with the I.R.S. Summons issued on April 29, 2009; Why the respondent should not be incarcerated and ordered to pay a daily fine until she complies with the Order, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the United States.(Duong, D)
June 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/17/10 DENYING respondent's 25 Motion to Proceed IFP and 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Owen, K)
May 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 5/11/10 ORDERING that respondent Linda P. Shadley shall appear at the Office of Internal Revenue Officer Charles Duff on 6/3/10, at 9:00 a.m. and comply with the Internal Revenue Service Summons issued on 4/29/09. The Petition requesting that respondent be held in contempt is dropped without prejudice, subject to its being renewed if respondent does not comply fully with this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/6/10: Show Cause Hearing set for 5/10/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
February 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/1/10: Recommending that the IRS summons issued to respondent, Linda P. Shadley, be enforced, and that respondent be ordered to appear at the I.R.S. offices. ORDERING that the Clerk shall serve this and future orders by mail to Ms. Linda P. Shadley. Objections to F&R due within ten (10) days. (Kaminski, H)
December 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/7/09 ORDERING that w/in 7 days the government to file and serve a declaration indicating how and in what way respondent failed to comply w/ the summons; respondent may file a response w/in 7 days after being served the government's declaration.(Yin, K)
October 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/21/09 ORDERING that the Order to Show Cause of 9/3/09 4 is DISREGARDED. Respondent shall appear at IRS offices, 4430 Watt Avenue, Sacramento, California, on 11/03/09 at 1:00 p.m. to provide testimony and produce documents responsive to Petitioner's IRS summons. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 4 [DISREGARDED PER ORDER 7 ] ORDER to SHOW CAUSE reTax Summons Enforcement signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/3/09 ORDERING that respondent, Linda P. Shadley, appear before UnitedStates Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows, on 10/15/200 9 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (GGH). The respondent may notify the Court, in a writing filed with the Clerk and served on the United States Attorney at least 10 days prior to the date set for the show cause hearing, that the respondent has no objections to enforcement of the summons. The respondent's appearance at the hearing will then be excused. Show Cause Response due by 10/5/2009. (Duong, D) Modified on 10/21/2009 (Mena-Sanchez, L).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America et al v. Shadley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: United States of America
Represented By: Yoshinori H. T. Himel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Duff
Represented By: Yoshinori H. T. Himel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Linda P. Shadley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?