StorageCraft Technology Corporation v. Kirby
Plaintiff: StorageCraft Technology Corporation
Defendant: James Kirby
Case Number: 2:2009mc00107
Filed: November 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/21/10 ORDERING that the plaintiff's 11/25/09 motion to compel compliance with 4 is disposed of, having been withdrawn by the moving party without prejudice. The hearing on that motion, previously set for 1/22/10, is VACATED. Non-party NetJapan's request for the imposition of sanctions is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
January 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/4/2010 re 23 Stipulation filed by StorageCraft Technology Corporation, SET/RESET MOTION HEARING as to 23 Stipulation, 4 MOTION to COMPEL Compliance with Subpoenas: Motion Hearing CONTINUED for 1/22/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff's response to non-party NetJapan's opposition shall be filed and served on or before 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, January 20, 2010. Telephonic appearance encouraged. Parties shall contact the courtroom deputy at (916) 930-4128 no later than 48 hours before the hearing to arrange telephonic appearance. (Buzo, P)
December 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/24/09 ORDERING THAT the 8 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; the hearing on plf's 4 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoenas is CONTINUED to 01/08/10 at 10:00 AM in Courtr oom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Non-party NetJapan, Inc.'s opposition to plf's motion is due by 12/31/09 and plf's response is due by 5:00 p.m. 01/06/10. The court encourages telephonic appearance at the hearing. Parties may contact the judge's clerk to make arrangements. (Benson, A.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: StorageCraft Technology Corporation v. Kirby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: StorageCraft Technology Corporation
Represented By: James D. McNairy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Kirby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?