Hardison v. Copeland

Hardison v. Copeland

Plaintiff:	Rochelle Marie Hardison
Defendant:	Remedios C Copeland
Case Number:	2:2010cv00002
Filed:	December 31, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge:	John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit:	Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2010	Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/9/10 recommending 15 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Rochelle Marie Hardison be denied and this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdction. Objections to F&R's to be filed within 10 days of being served with the F&R's. REFERRED to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr..(Carlos, K)
April 23, 2010	Filing 12 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/22/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall either file whatever document is required to file a default motion no later than 4:00 p.m. on 6/21/10, or Show Ca use ("OSC") in writing filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on 6/21/10, why this action should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. If a hearing is requested on the OSC, it will be held on 7/12/10, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date and time. (Becknal, R)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2010

Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/9/10 recommending 15 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Rochelle Marie Hardison be denied and this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdction. Objections to F&R's to be filed within 10 days of being served with the F&R's. REFERRED to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr..(Carlos, K)

April 23, 2010

Filing 12 ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/22/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall either file whatever document is required to file a default motion no later than 4:00 p.m. on 6/21/10, or Show Ca use ("OSC") in writing filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on 6/21/10, why this action should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. If a hearing is requested on the OSC, it will be held on 7/12/10, at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date and time. (Becknal, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hardison v. Copeland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Remedios C Copeland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rochelle Marie Hardison
Represented By:	Karl-Fredric Joseph Seligman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?