Bartholomew v. Swarthout
Petitioner: Kevin Bartholomew
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Case Number: 2:2010cv00073
Filed: January 11, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/22/11 recommending that the petition be denied; and that a certificate of appealability not issue in this action, should these findings and recommendations be adopted for the reasons set forth within the findings and recommendations. Petition 1 and motion for certificate of appealability 25 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/15/11. (Plummer, M)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/14/11. (Plummer, M)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/28/2011 ORDERING that the parties have 21 days to provide simultaneous supplemental briefing, in light of the very recent decision noted in this order, demonstrating why the instant petition should not be dismissed.(Yin, K)
March 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/5/2010 ORDERING that petitioner has DISCHARGED his filing fee obligation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). (Yin, K)
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/29/2010 ORDERING petitioner to submit w/in 30 days, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; the clerk to send petitioner an ifp form; respondent to file a response to the petition w/in 60 days; reply due w/in 30 days of answer; if response is a motion, opposition or statement of non-opposition due w/in 30 days of motion, reply due w/in 15 days thereafter; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell) (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bartholomew v. Swarthout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kevin Bartholomew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?