Benyammi v. Walker
Petitioner: Robert Benyammi
Respondent: James Walker
Case Number: 2:2010cv00104
Filed: January 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/04/11 ordering this civil rights action was closed on 03/16/11. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Plummer, M)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/18/2011 GRANTING 24 Motion for Extension. Petitioner is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order in which to file and serve objections to the 11/5/2010 Findings and Recommendations. (Donati, J)
January 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER adopting 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/18/11: Petitioner's requests for a law library access, a word processor and polygraph examination are denied. (Kaminski, H)
December 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/9/10, ORDERING that petitioner's 20 motion for an ext of time is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file objections to the 19 F&R's within 30 days from the date of this order. Petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. It is RECOMMENDED that petitioner's request for a law library access, a word processor and a polygraph exam is DENIED. Matter referred to Judge Burrell. Within 21 days after being served with these F&R's, pltf may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
November 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/2010 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 14 motion to dismiss be granted. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
June 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/03/10. (Plummer, M)
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 01/27/10 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send petitioner a copy of the IFP form used by this district.(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benyammi v. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Benyammi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?