Edstrom et al v. NDEX West, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Major Edstrom and Teri Anne Edstrom
Defendant: NDEX West, LLC, Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc., America's Servicing Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration Services (MERS)
Case Number: 2:2010cv00105
Filed: January 13, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: El Dorado
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/14/12 DISMISSING this matter WITHOUT PREJUDICE; GRANTING 60 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING AS MOOT 58 Motion for Summary Judgment and VACATING the hearing on said motion. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM and ORDER denying 41 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 3/2/11. (Kaminski, H)
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/4/2011 ORDERNG that the hearing on Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.'s 41 Motion for Award of Attorney Fees is CONTINUED to February 11, 2011, at 10 :00 a.m. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition brief or notice of non-opposition no later than January 28, 2011. The defendant may file and serve a reply on or before February 4, 2011. Plaintiffs' counsel is ordered to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150.00 for failing to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to defendant's motion in compliance with Local Rule 230(c). Plaintiffs' counsel shall file his response to the order to show cause on or before January 28, 2011. A hearing on the order to show cause, if necessary, will follow the hearing on the motion. (Duong, D)
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/23/2010 GRANTING 27 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file and serve an SAC within 20 days of the date of this Order; the SAC shall comply with both the instant order and the Court's previous order of 10/18/10 40 , dismissing defendants ACS and MERS. Defendants, including NDEX, shall have 30 days after service of the SAC to file their response thereto. (Krueger, M)
October 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/18/2010 ORDERING that defendants' 23 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed without leave to amend. Defendants America's Servicing Company and Mortgage Electronic Registration are hereby dismissed from this action. (Duong, D)
October 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 10/5/2010 ORDERING 36 that the entry of default 32 , be WITHDRAWN, and thereby remove as to NDEX West. (Reader, L)
August 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STIPULATION and ORDER 24 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/25/2010 ORDERING 23 Motion to Dismiss Hearing reset for 10/8/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Reader, L)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/14/10 ORDERING that the time within which Plaintiffs must serve this lawsuit is enlarged from 6/14/10 to 6/21/2010. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edstrom et al v. NDEX West, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NDEX West, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Lenders Network USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: America's Servicing Company
Represented By: Christopher A. Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Services (MERS)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Major Edstrom
Represented By: Richard Alan Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teri Anne Edstrom
Represented By: Richard Alan Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?