Anderson et al v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Plaintiff: Kandy Anderson and Douglas Anderson
Defendant: Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv00128
Filed: January 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/9/2011 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/13/11 ORDERING Status Conference RE-SET for 2/11/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd; parties to file a joint status report by 2/4/11. (Carlos, K)
November 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/17/10 ORDERING dft's motion to dismiss 41 DENIED; and this matter is set for Status Conference for 1/19/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (KJM) before Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Carlos, K)
June 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/28/10 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 25 is GRANTED with leave to amend within thirty days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
May 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/14/10 ORDERING this action is reassigned to the Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings, including entry of final judgment. All documents hereafter filed shall be denominated as 2:10-cv-00128-KJM. (Becknal, R)
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/3/10 ORDERING that defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot for failure to address the operative pleading. (Owen, K)
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 2/22/2010 ORDERING 15 Plaintiffs are GRANTED five days leave to file the First Amended Complaint. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson et al v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Select Comfort Retail Corporation
Represented By: Wesley C. J. Ehlers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kandy Anderson
Represented By: R. Parker White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Anderson
Represented By: R. Parker White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?