Kirk v. Richards
Plaintiff: Larry W Kirk
Defendant: T. Richards
Case Number: 2:2010cv00373
Filed: February 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 91 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/20/2012 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 76 amended motion for summary judgment be denied; defendant's 78 motion for summary judgment be granted; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
July 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/11/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff will be provided 21 days to file additional evidentiary materials regarding defendant's 78 motion for summary judgment, but it is not required. No extensions will be given. (Zignago, K.)
May 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/4/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 56 motion to compel defendant to answer interrogatories and requests for production of documents is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; no later than 6/30/2012, plaintiff may file a supplement to his pending 76 motion for summary judgment as stated in this order; and plaintiff's 64 motion to subpoena witnesses is DENIED as premature. (See Order for Details) (Yin, K)
April 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/03/12 denying 60 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying 63 Motion for a settlement conference. (Plummer, M)
November 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/17/11 granting 52 Motion to conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference. (Plummer, M)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/17/11 ORDERING the parties may conduct discovery until 01/27/12. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before 4/27/12. Plaintiff's 05/05/11 motion to subpoena witnesses 35 is denied without prejudice to renewing the motion at a later time. (Plummer, M)
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/30/2011 ORDERING that the 49 findings and recommendations filed September 19, 2011, are adopted in full. Defendant's 23 February 4, 2011 motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice. (Duong, D)
September 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/19/11 GRANTING 43 Motion to Withdraw Admissions and VACATING 11 Scheduling Order, with dates to be reset following the district court's ruling. It is h ereby RECOMMENDED that the 23 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT filed by T. Richards be denied without prejudice. Objections due within 7 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Motion referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Donati, J)
September 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER ADOPTING 41 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 09/05/11 and ORDERING that plf's 19 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/8/11 ORDERING that plaintiff show cause within 21 days why the requests for admission identified herein should not be deemed admitted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(3).(Dillon, M)
July 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/07/11 ORDERING the clerk of the court shall randomly assigne a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 1/27/11 motion for summary judgment 19 be denied. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
February 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/18/2011 DENYING pltf's 20 motion for a settlement conference. (Yin, K)
April 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Larry W. Kirksigned by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/24/10. Initial partial filing fee of $3.47 shall be forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. Monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Clerk until the $346.53 balance is paid in full. (cc: financial).(Williams, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kirk v. Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry W Kirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?