Securities and Exchange Commission v. Loomis et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Lawrence "Lee" Loomis, Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, John Hagener and Lismar Financial Services, LLC |
2:2010cv00458 |
February 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Placer |
Morrison C. England |
Kendall J. Newman |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 FINAL JUDGMENT signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/20/15 against Lawrence Lee Loomis. (Meuleman, A) |
Filing 124 ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/30/2014 ORDERING 123 the Court hereby APPROVES the Commission's request to withdraw, as to defendant Hagener only, its request for monetary relief in the form of disgorgement , as set forth in Section II of the Complaint, and for civil monetary penalties, as set forth in Section III of the Complaint. The permanent injunctions previously entered by the Court on 4/14/2103 against Hagener are not affected by this Order, and shall remain in full force and effect. 82 (Reader, L) |
Filing 115 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/23/2014 ORDERING 108 that within 14 days of the date of this order, the SEC submit a proposed final judgment against Loomis, incorporating the permanent injunction, the amount of disgorgement discussed in this order and the appropriate prejudgment interest, and reflecting that no civil penalties are imposed. (Reader, L) |
Filing 110 STIPULATION and ORDER TO VACATE deadline for Plaintiff's remedies Motion against Defendant John Hagener signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/18/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 102 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/7/14 ORDERING that Douglas Beevers and Klaus Kolb are directed to show cause within fourteen days of the date of this order why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $250 each. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 97 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/3/2013 GRANTING 64 Motion for Summary Judgement as to claims of false material statements and omissions under Rule 10b-5 and Section 17(a), claims for scheme liability under subparts (a) and (c) of Rul e 10b-5 and subparts (1) and (3) of section 17(a) and claims under Section 5(a) adn 5(c) of the Securities Act. Case set for status on 10/17/2013 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller to discuss the remedial phase of the case. Joint Status Report due no later than 10/10/2013. (Donati, J) |
Filing 96 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/27/2013 DENYING 88 Motion to Stay without prejudice. (Donati, J) Modified on 8/27/2013 (Donati, J). |
Filing 82 ORDER OF INJUNCTION AS TO DEFENDANT JOHN HAGENER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/12/13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Hagener's Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Hagener shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein; This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes, including but not limited to, enforcing the terms of this Order of Injunction. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 70 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/11/2013 ORDERING 64 the pending Motion for Summary Judgment is STAYED until resolution of the motion for expansion filed in case 2:12-CR-315 JAM; and Defendant Loomis is DIRECTED to notify this Court within 14 days of the resolution of the motion in the criminal case. (Reader, L) |
Filing 41 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/11/11: Pretrial Conference and Trial dates are VACATED; Further Status Conference set for 1/18/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Joint statement due no later than 14 days prior to Status Conference. (Manzer, C) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/6/2011 ORDERING that the parties shall submit a joint stipulation no later than 6/21/2011, proposing a date for a status conference and clearing the current pre-trial and trial dates. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/14/10 ORDERING that the Proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 8/24/10 23 are ADOPTED; Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment against defendants Loomis Wealth Solutions, LLC, and Lismar Financial Services, LLC 20 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/25/10 ORDERING that CIV S.-10-0458 MCE KJN shall not be reassigned.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 23 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/23/10: ORDERING that the hearing on plaintiff's motion for default judgment, presently set for August 26, 2010, is vacated 20 . RECOMMENDING that 20 plaintiff's motion for default judgment be denied without prejudice. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 22 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/11/10. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/26/2011. Discovery due by 5/26/2011. Dispositive Motions filed by 7/28/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/26/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. Jury Trial set for 3/26/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.