Harris v. City of Redding California et al
Plaintiff: Mary Harris
Defendant: City of Redding California, Kim Neimer and Matthew McCallum
Case Number: 2:2010cv00487
Filed: February 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/29/12 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/1/2011 ORDERING that having reviewed the Stipulation and Joint Request for Modification of the Pretrial Scheduling Order, the Court orders the following modifications: Discovery cutoff 1/30/2 012; Dispositive Motion cutoff - to be filed on or before 3/7/2012, for hearing on 4/4/2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #6; Joint Pretrial Statement - to be filed on or before 5/18/2012; Final Pretrial Conference 5/25/2012 at 11:00 a.m.; Trial 7/9/2012 at 9:00 a.m.. (Zignago, K.)
October 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 AMENDED STIPULATION and ORDER 21 modifying the 10/29/2010 scheduling order, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/21/11: Discovery is due by 12/1/2011. Dispositive Motions to be filed by 1/25/2012, and set for hearing on 2/22/2012 at 9:30 a.m. in C ourtroom #6. Joint Pretrial Statement to be filed by 4/6/2012. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 4/13/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial is SET for 6/18/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Kastilahn, A)
August 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/25/10, ORDERING that the Initial Scheduling Conference is RESET to 10/28/2010 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. City of Redding California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Redding California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kim Neimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew McCallum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?