Ammons v. Bakewell, et al
| Anthony Ammons |
| A. Nangalama and C. Bakewell |
| 2:2010cv00544 |
| March 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 52
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/10/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 41
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/08/11 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 40 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant Bakewell's 01/03/11 motion for summary judgment 28 be granted; and this action be closed. Motion for Summary Judgment 28 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER striking 38 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/05/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/08/11 denying 27 Motion for a court order to obtain the attendance of an incarcerated witness. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/18/2010 DENYING, as moot, pltf's 25 motion. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/7/2010 DENYING pltf's 21 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
