Nichalson v. First Franklin, et al
| Lynn A. Nichalson |
| First Franklin, Raincross Financial Services, Inc. and Mortgage Technology, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00598 |
| March 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Morrison C. England |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/30/2010 ORDERING that the matter is hereby REMANDED to Superior Court, County of Sacramento. Defendants 32 Motion to Dismiss and 33 Motion to Strike are both DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close the file. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 09/02/10 GRANTING with leave to amend 21 Motion to Dismiss ; DENYING as moot 22 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within 20 days; If no second amended complaint is filed within the 20 days, claims will be dismissed without leave to amend. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/11/2010. Defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend and 9 Motion to Strike is DENIED as MOOT. Plaintiff may file Amended Complaint no later than 20 days after date this Order is electronically filed. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
