Celestine Stoot vs. High Desert State Prison, et al
| Celestine Stoot |
| McDonald, High Desert State Prison, Chief Medical Officer, High Desert State Prison, Director of Corrections, T. Kimura, Wilcox and Swingle |
| 2:2010cv00601 |
| March 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/02/10 ORDERING this action be randomly assigned to a District Judge. U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez randomly assigned to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/22/10 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the service of this order, either the $350.00 filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided with this order. Plaintiff's complaint filed on 03/15/10 is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner and the form complaint for use in a civil rights action. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
