Breed v. City of Stockton, et al
William Alfonso Breed |
City of Stockton, Thomas T Morris, Robert DuBois, Walter E Vancil, Benjamin Cromwell, Michael T Sera and Grant Bedford |
2:2010cv00650 |
March 17, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Garland E. Burrell |
Garland E. Burrell |
Gregory G. Hollows |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/31/12; Since no dispositional document has been filed, and the parties have not provided any reason for the continued pendency of this action, this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/5/12 VACATING trial date of 4/17/12; ORDERING the settlement dispositional documents to be filed no later than 5/28/12. Failure to respond by this deadline may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. A Status Conference is scheduled for 6/25/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. in the event no dispositional document is filed, or if this action is not otherwise dismissed. A joint status report shall be filed 14 days prior to the status conference. (Meuleman, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.