Colbert v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Colbert v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al

Colbert v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al

Plaintiff:	Randy Colbert
Defendant:	Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2010cv00747
Filed:	March 26, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge:	Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge:	Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 24, 2011	Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/24/2011 ORDERING the Third Cause of Action in the First Amended Complaint filed in Solano Coutny of 2/8/2011 is DISMISSED with prejudice; the amount remaining in controversy is $20,000 or less, which is insufficient to support diversity jurisdiction; REMANDING CASE to Superior Court, Solano County for all further proceedings. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)
May 19, 2011	Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/18/11 ORDERING the Final Pretrial Conference reset for 6/27/11 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A JOINT final pretrial statement shall be filed no later than seven (7) days prior to the final pretrial conference, which shall address Defendant's averments concerning federal jurisdiction, specifically including the amount in controversy.(Becknal, R)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 24, 2011

Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/24/2011 ORDERING the Third Cause of Action in the First Amended Complaint filed in Solano Coutny of 2/8/2011 is DISMISSED with prejudice; the amount remaining in controversy is $20,000 or less, which is insufficient to support diversity jurisdiction; REMANDING CASE to Superior Court, Solano County for all further proceedings. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Waggoner, D)

May 19, 2011

Filing 17 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/18/11 ORDERING the Final Pretrial Conference reset for 6/27/11 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A JOINT final pretrial statement shall be filed no later than seven (7) days prior to the final pretrial conference, which shall address Defendant's averments concerning federal jurisdiction, specifically including the amount in controversy.(Becknal, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colbert v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Colbert
Represented By:	Larry Edward Lulofs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Carr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?