Smith v. California State Prison - Sacramento et al
Plaintiff: Bernard L Smith
Defendant: California State Prison - Sacramento and California Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2010cv00766
Filed: March 31, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/12/14 DENYING 66 Motion for Recovery of Costs. (Manzer, C)
January 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/04/12 ordering defendants are relieved of having to pay the costs for service. The clerk of the court is directed to open a separate action, randomly assign a United States Magistrate Judge to the action, and file plaintiff's complaint 59 in the new action. (The new case number is 2:12-cv-0024 GGH P). (Plummer, M) Modified on 1/5/2012 (Plummer, M).
November 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/9/11 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action; Within 14 days from the date of this order defen dants Baker, Bal, Harvey, Hontz, Macomber, Maserut, Mini, Schroeder and Woods shall each pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $55.00, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service; and Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal. It is RECOMMENDED that Defendants motion to dismiss based on plaintiffs failure to exhaustadministrative remedies 20 be granted; All other pending motions 53 & 54 be denied as moot; and this action be closed. Motions referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (cc USM)(Dillon, M)
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/1/11 ORDERING that the court's August 3, 2011 Order to Show Cause is discharged; Defendants' motion for an extension of time 48 is granted; and Defendants shall file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss on or before September 8, 2011. (Becknal, R)
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/02/11 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants' motion to dismiss. Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this case he may file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. (Plummer, M)
September 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/15/10 granting 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for thisaction. All fees shall be collected in accordance with the court's CD C order filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. The clerk of the court is directed to provide plaintiff with the court's form complaint for a 1983 action. Plaintiff's 03/31/10 motion for an emergency injunction 1 is denied as premature. (Plummer, M)
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/22/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall file a complaint within 30 days of the date of this order; and Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff the courts form for filing a civil rights action.(Dillon, M)
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/14/10 ORDERING plaintiff to submit either a completed IFP or the appropriate filing fee within 30 days. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff and IFP. (Williams, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. California State Prison - Sacramento et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard L Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California State Prison - Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?