Zieske v. Vision Financial Network, et al
| Robert Zieske |
| Vision Financial Network, American Brokers Conduit, Inc., American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Shahram Yektarad and Michael Azad |
| 2:2010cv00769 |
| April 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/20/11 ORDERING that the court hereby ORDERS dismissal of this action without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to CLOSE this case. Plaintiff's 44 second amended motion for d efault judgment and defendant Michael Azad's 45 motion for extension of time are hereby DENIED as moot. The April 27, 2011 hearing on defendant Michael Azad's 48 51 motion to remand is hereby VACATED and the motion is DENIED as moot. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/7/11 ORDERING Plaintiff shall clarify how he seeks to effect dismissal within fourteen days of this order. If Plaintiff seeks a court order, any Defendant who has appeared shall have fourteen days from service of the request for an order to respond.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/20/2011 ORDERING that the hearing on Pltf's 44 Second Amended Motion for Default Judgment, presently set for 1/27/2011, is VACATED. Pltf shall re-notice the second amended motion for a he aring date so as to provide every party the 28 days' notice in accordance with LR 230(b) and FRCP 5(a)(1)(D). Pltf shall serve the second amended motion upon every party. Pltf shall file the amended notice of motion and proof of service with the court. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/6/2010 ORDERING Plaintiff shall file a motion for entry of default judgment as to defendants Vision Financial Network and Shahram Yektarad within 30 days of the date this Order is filed. If pltf fai ls to timely file the motion, pltf shall show cause in writing no later than 4:00 PM on 1/24/2011, why these dfts should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution. Status Conference reset for 3/28/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. Joint Status Report shall be filed 14 days prior to the status conf to explain the status of the default judgment; American Brokers Conduit, Inc. is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice, re 16 order. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 08/27/10 GRANTING leave to file Amended Complaint and add Nationstar Morgage, Inc. as a defendant. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/16/10 ORDERING that the Status Conference is continued to 9/20/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report is due 14 days prior to the status conference. Further, Pltf is notified that if a certificate of service is not filed re service of each deft, it will be assumed that no service has been made and a dismissal order could issue. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/20/10: All claims against Defendant American Home Mortgage Servicing are dismissed. American Home Mortgage Servicing's pending motion to dismiss is denied as moot 7 . (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
