Johnson v. Secret River Inc., et al
| Scott N. Johnson |
| Secret River, Inc., Prestige Management, Dulku & Dulku, Inc., Bharat B. Sethi, Harjeet Singh, Parmjit Kaur, Danny Yi, David Chan and Jennifer Chan |
| 2:2010cv00792 |
| April 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/15/2010 re 17 ORDERING that defendant Bharat B. Sethi be and is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to remain open with remaining Defendants. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/19/2010 ORDERING defendants Parmjit Kaur and Harjeet Singh are dismissed with prejudice. This case to remain open with remaining defendants. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/12/10: Defendants David Chan and Jennifer Chan are hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/4/2010 GRANTING plaintiff's 5 Request. Defendants Prestige Management and Secret River, Inc. are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
