G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Shahen et al
Plaintiff: |
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC |
Defendant: |
Marcus Lee Shahen, Shelley Renee Hamilton, Daniel Lee Krause, Nona Terese Krause and Cool Water Restaurants, Inc |
Case Number: |
2:2010cv00814 |
Filed: |
April 6, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
County: |
Santa Clara |
Presiding Judge: |
Frank C. Damrell |
Presiding Judge: |
Frank C. Damrell |
Presiding Judge: |
Kendall J. Newman |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Statutory Actions |
Cause of Action: |
47 U.S.C. ยง 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 26, 2012 |
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/25/12: IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's application for default judgment (Dkt. No. 26) against defendants Daniel Lee Krause and Nona Terese Krause, individua lly and doing business as Tommy's Beach Bar & Grill, be granted. The court enter judgment in plaintiff's favor with respect to its claims brought pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(a) and 47 U.S.C. § 553(a). The court award statutory d amages in an amount of $10,000 to plaintiff, payable by Daniel Lee Krause and Nona Terese Krause on a joint and several basis. This case be closed and all future dates be vacated. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties.(Matson, R)
|
December 20, 2011 |
Filing
34
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/19/11 ORDERING that no later than 01/06/12, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why: (1) it failed to file the supplemental briefing authorized by the court; (2) it or its couns el should not be sanctioned for such failure; and (3) why plaintiff's action should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No later than 01/06/12, plaintiff may file the supplemental briefing authorized by the court . Plaintiff's failure to comply with any portion of this Order to Show Cause shall serve as additional grounds for, and plaintiff's consent to, the dismissal of plaintiff's action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Benson, A.)
|
October 20, 2011 |
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/2011 GRANTING 31 Request to Appear Telephonically. (Zignago, K.)
|
February 25, 2011 |
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/25/2011 ORDERING Plaintiff's Counsel to Show Cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150 for failing to comply with the Court's 8/19/2010 Order. Counsel shall file his response to the OSC on or before 3/11/2011. A Hearing on the OSC, if necessary, is set for 3/25/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Krueger, M)
|
August 19, 2010 |
Filing
15
ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/18/2010 ORDERING that dispositional documents are to be filed on or before 2/10/2011. All dates/hearings set in this matter are VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
|
July 14, 2010 |
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/14/2010 re 12 ORDERING that the complaint against dfts Marcus Lee Shahen and Cool Water Restaurants, Inc is DISMISSED without prejudice. It is further stipulated that provided no Party referenced above has filed a motion to reopen this action by February 15, 2011, this Court shall not have jurisdiction to set aside the dismissal and the dismissal shall be deemed to be with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs.(Duong, D)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?