Miller v. Jones
Frederic R. Miller |
Dennis B. Jones |
2:2010cv00834 |
April 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 03/23/12 ORDERING that the re 34 Order Adopting F&Rs and 35 Judgment are VACATED; the 33 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full, defendant's 23 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.) |
Filing 33 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/06/11 ORDERING defendant's request for judicial notice [23-1] is granted. Plaintiff's request for leave to file late opposition 28 is granted. Plainti ff's motions to strike 29 and 31 are denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion to dismiss 23 be granted with prejudice. This action be closed. MOTION to DISMISS 23 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/11 ORDERING that The April 11, 2011 hearing on plaintiff's 26 request for judicial notice is VACATED. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff s hall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss no later than April 8, 2011. Failure to file opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in submission of the motion on the papers and a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Duong, D) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/1/2010 GRANTING plaintiff's Motions 9 for Reconsideration and 6 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Mr. Miller's 10 Motion for Return of Payment is GRANTED and Clerk directed to r efund filing fee (receipt # CAE200028119 dated 7/20/2010). Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with 30 days from date of service of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint that is in compliance. (cc: Financial Department) (Marciel, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/29/2010 ORDERING that within 21 days, Pltf shall submit the appropriate filing fee. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/6/10: Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-one days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Jones | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dennis B. Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Frederic R. Miller | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.