Foster v. Statti et al
| Ronald Foster |
| P. Statti, D. Peddicord, A. Lynn, M. Wright, M. DeForest, L. Kelly, G. Hale, D. Harlingue, D. Kraft, J. Kelly, Z. Golls, R. Gardiner, D Davey, T. Relez, T. Horman, D. Sisson, T. Bergsen, T. Cobb and Secretary of CDCR |
| 2:2010cv00929 |
| April 19, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/13/14 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to stipulation 84 and Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk of court shall close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/08/14 ordering the Custodian to produce Ronald Paul Foster at 06/10/14 at 1:00 p.m. in courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: KJN and OTCD)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2014 ORDERING that the 72 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Defendants' 53 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is DENIED. Defendants' 53 motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Plaintiff's 62 cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART, in the form of an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(g) that the objective component of his Eighth Amendment claim (the seriousness of the deprivation) is not genuinely in dispute and shall be treated as established in plaintiff's favor. Plaintiff's 62 cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED in all other respects. This matter shall proceed to trial against defendants Wright, Kraft, Davey and Statti on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/20/13 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for a protective order 58 is denied as moot; to the extent it has not been rendered moot, it is denied as overbroad and un warranted. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies 53 be denied. Defendants' motion for summary judgment 53 be denied. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment [62 ] be granted in part, in the form of an order pursuant to FRCP 56(g) that the objective component of his Eight Amendment claim (the seriousness of the deprivation) is not genuinely in dispute and shall be treated as established in plaintiff's fa vor. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment 62 be denied in all other respects. This matter proceed to trial against defendants Wright, Kraft, Davey and Statti on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims. Motions 53 and 62 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/09/13 granting 65 Motion for clarification and/or extension of time. Defendants shall file an opposition to plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment within 14 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/7/12 ORDERING 45 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; and 35 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/29/12 ORDERING that 40 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED; it is RECOMMENDED that 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/20/12 GRANTING 36 Motion for extension of time. Defendants have until May 5, 2012 to file and serve their opposition to the motion.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING 30 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/08/11 and ORDERING that defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and defendants shall file an answer within 28 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/27/11 ORDERING that a district judge be assigned to this case. IT IS RECOMMENDED that 23 Motion to Dismiss be denied and defendants file an answer within 28 days if these findings and recommendations are adopted. Motion referred to Judge Mendez. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/31/2011 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, this court's 12/10/10 order is AFFIRMED and pltf's 16 motion is DENIED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/26/10, ORDERING that pltf's first amended complaint is dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint within 28 days from the date of service of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/2/10 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Ronald Foster to the clerk until the balance of $350 is pai d in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
