Flannery v. Walker
Orval D. Flannery |
James Walker |
2:2010cv00950 |
April 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Gregory G. Hollows |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/31/13 RECOMMENDING that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/11/2013 ORDERING that counsel should be prepared to discuss at the 7/31/2013 status conference whether Claim Three is moot on grounds that the alleged injury can no longer be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.(Yin, K) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/25/2013 GRANTING petitioner an evidentiary hearing on Claim Three; this matter is SET for a status conference on 7/31/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Yin, K) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/24/10 ADOPTING 12 Findings and Recommendations in full. Petitioner's Motion to Stay is GRANTED, pending exhaustion of claim three. Petitioner is directed to inform the court and file a request to lift stay within 28 days of a decision by the CA Supreme Court concluding state court habeas review. (Owen, K) |
Filing 12 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/16/10 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is to randomly assign a district judge to this case; and Clerk of the Court is also directed to substitute the name of Ti m Virga for that of James Walker as respondent in the docket of this case. It is RECOMMENDED that 2 MOTION to STAY be granted, pending exhaustion of claim three; and Petitioner be directed to inform this court and file a request to lift the stay within 28 days of a decision by the California Supreme Court concluding state court habeas review. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/1/10 ORDERING that Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the petition and the motion to stayupon respondent; and Respondent is directed to review the petition and the pending 2 motion to stay and to file a response to the motion to stay, within 21 days. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 04/19/2010, CASE TRANSFERRRED to Sacramento Division. New Case Number 2:10-cv-950 GGH. Old Case Number 1:10-cv-650 GSA. (Flores, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Flannery v. Walker | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Orval D. Flannery | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: James Walker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.