Birk v. Gateway Funding Corporation et al
| Caroline Birk |
| Gateway Funding Corporation, Hollencrest Bayview Partners Lakewood Ranch Homeowners Association, Robert Winston, Royal Crown Bancorp, Inc., The Money Brokers, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., FCI National Lender Services, Inc., Bank of America, Recontrust and Bank of New York |
| 2:2010cv01039 |
| April 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Siskiyou |
| Morrison C. England |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/29/11 ORDERING that The 63 March 9, 2011, order and final 64 judgment are VACATED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). The Clerk of the Court is directed to re- open this action. Plaintiff' 58 motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Magistrate Judge's 57 December 2, 2010, order is AFFIRMED. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 03/09/11 AFFIRMING 57 Order ; DENYING 58 Motion for Reconsideration ; All other pending motions are denied as moot; No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
61
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/9/11 RECOMMENDING dft's motions to dismiss 13 1 20 21 26 32 and 34 be granted with respect to pltf's federal claims; pltf's TILA and FCRA clai ms to be dismissed with prejudice; pltf's state law claims be dismissed without prejudice; and this action be dismissed in its entirety. Objections to these F&R's due within 14 days after being served. REFERRED to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr..(Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/1/2010 DENYING 44 Plaintiff's motion to strike; Plaintiff's untimely oppositions 43 , 48 , 49 , and 50 ) are DISREGARDED; and Defendants' motions 13 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 26 , 32 , and 34 stand SUBMITTED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/29/10 ORDERING the court will grant plaintiff's request for a continuance, All of defendants' motions referenced above are reset for hearing on 12/1/10, at 10:00 a.m. before the under signed in Redding, California. Plaintiff's oppositions to the motions originally set for hrg on 10/28 are due on or before 11/5/10. All other oppositions are due 14 days before the 12/1/10, hrg date. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to file timely oppositions will have the result that plaintiff will not be able to present any oral argument as to unopposed motions.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/25/10 VACATING the Initial Scheduling Conference set for 09/09/10 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison.(Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/06/10 ORDERING that the Clerk shall issue summons and new case documents; Clerk shall send plf summons, 10 USM forms and a copy of the complaint; plf shall complete and submit documents to the U.S. Marshal w/i 15 days and file a notice of such service with the court w/i 20 days; USM directed to serve all process w/i 60 days (cc: USM). (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
