Feezor v. Patterson et al
Plaintiff: Lary Feezor
Defendant: Gary L. Patterson, Pendleton Woolen Mills, Fusion Pit a General Partnership, HanesBrands Direct, LLC, The Gap, Inc., Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, VF Outdoor, Inc. and Edd Bauer a Delaware, LLC
Case Number: 2:2010cv01165
Filed: May 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 132 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/21/2013 DENYING 125 & 126 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Donati, J)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/5/12 GRANTING 76 and 77 Motions for Summary Judgment; DENYING AS MOOT 85 , 87 , 92 , and 93 Motions. The court declines to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining state law claims, and therefore, plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
May 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/16/11 ORDERING that defendants' motions for protective order 51 52 are DENIED; The inspections shall be conducted outside of the stores' business hours, and may take place on two separate days if necessary; attendance at the inspection shall be limited to plaintiff's counsel, plaintiff, plaintiff's expert, and the expert's assistant. (Becknal, R)
May 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 STIPULATION and ORDER 56 , signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 5/4/11, ORDERING that defendant VF Outdoor, Inc., dba Vans is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)
April 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/15/2011 ORDERING that the court hereby GRANTS plaintiff's 32 motion for continuance of defendants' 30 32 motions for summary judgment. Defendants may refile their motions for summary judgment once plaintiff has had a reasonable opportunity to conduct the discovery set forth in his motion. (Duong, D)
August 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STATUS ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/11/10 ORDERING: Discovery due by 9/2/11; Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 9/16/2011; Motions to be filed by 1/13/2012l Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/16/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr..; Jury Trial set for 5/22/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr..; this status order will become final without further order of the court unless objections are filed within 14 days of service of this order. (Carlos, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feezor v. Patterson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lary Feezor
Represented By: Lynn Hubbard, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary L. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pendleton Woolen Mills
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fusion Pit a General Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HanesBrands Direct, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VF Outdoor, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edd Bauer a Delaware, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?