California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant: Chico Scrap Metal, Inc., George Scott, Sr. and George Scott, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2010cv01207
Filed: May 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Butte
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 Clean Water Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 323 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/16/17: Third Amended Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs, except as provided for by the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties with respect to any disputes arising under the Settlement Agreement. (Kaminski, H)
September 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 302 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/5/2017 GRANTING 293 Motion to Continue the trial date pending the Ninth Circuits decision in Robertson and VACATES the trial date. ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Status Report within six months of the date of this Order updating the Court on the status of Robertson. (Washington, S)
September 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 288 ORDER denying plaintiff's 257 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/21/16. (Kastilahn, A)
September 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 287 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/31/2016 ORDERING Trial Reset for 10/2/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; Pretrial Conference Reset for 7/27/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; and Pretrial Conference Statement due by 7/20/2017.(Reader, L)
August 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 285 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/3/2016 ORDERING 272 Trial CONTINUED to 7/31/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; Pretrial Conference set for 6/1/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; and the Pretrial Conference Statement is due by 5/25/2017. (Reader, L)
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 261 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/23/2016 CONTINUING the Final Pretrial Conference to 8/25/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; ORDERING that Final Pretrial Conference Statements be filed by 7/29/2016; CONTINUING the Jury Trial to 10/24/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Michel, G.)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 253 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 01/07/16 ORDERING that plaitiff's 230 Motion for Interim Attorney Fees is DENIED; plaintiff's 245 Motion to Strike defendant's Errata is DENIED as moot. (Benson, A)
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 252 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 01/04/16 ORDERING that the 224 Motion for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (Benson, A)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 251 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/4/2016 GRANTING 226 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G.)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 223 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/11/15 ORDERING that the pretrial conference in this action will be rescheduled for January 11, 2016 at 2:30 pm. A joint pretrial statement shall be filed seven days prior to the hearing. (Becknal, R)
August 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/14/15 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 165 and 174 Motions for Summary Judgment. (Meuleman, A)
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 214 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/8/2015 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 165 , 174 Motions for Summary Judgment, 187 , 204 Motions to Strike to 7/13/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; CONTINUING the Jury Trial to 2/9/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Michel, G.)
December 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/3/2014 LIFTING the stay on 158 Order on Motion to Compel; ORDERING the defendants to produce responsive documents within 30 days; ORDERING the defendants to produce the person most knowledgeable for Defendant Chico Scrap Metal, Inc. regarding the financial wherewithal of the company and Mr. George Scott, Sr. for deposition at a time and location that is convenient to the parties within 30 days. (Michel, G)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 163 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO BIFURCATE OR, IN THE ALTERANTIVE, MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AND MOTION TO RECONSIDER DISCOVERY ORDER; ORDER AMENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE CERTAIN EXPERT DISCOVERY* signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/2/14 ORDERING that The parties' stipulation to extend the expert disclosure deadlines concerning the specified expert opinion testimony is approved.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/9/2014 GRANTING 153 Motion to Compel; ORDERING the defendants to produce responsive documents within 30 days; ORDERING the defendants to produce the person most knowledgeable and Mr. George Scot t, Sr. for deposition, within 30 days, at a time and location that is convenient to the parties; STAYING this order to permit the defendants to file an amended motion to bifurcate and/or a motion for reconsideration of the instant order; ORDERING tha t said stay expire without further order of the court if no such motion is filed within 7 days; OTHERWISE ORDERING that said stay expire 7 days after the district judge rules on any filed motion(s), unless this order is vacated in the district judge's ruling. (Michel, G)
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 148 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 6/17/14 ORDERING that Designation of Expert Witnesses deadline is CONTINUED to 9/23/2014, and supplemental disclosure and disclosure of rebuttal expert deadline is CONTINUED to 10/24/2014. (Kastilahn, A)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/4/14 DENYING 131 MOTION to BIFURCATE. (Meuleman, A)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/25/2014 GRANTING IN PART 130 Motion to Compel; ORDERING that the plaintiff may test media other than storm water during one additional Dry Inspection day and two additional Wet Inspection days; DENYING 130 Motion to Compel as to all other issues raised; DENYING AS MOOT 140 Request to Strike. (Michel, G)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/14/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 102 motion to quash is granted in part; Plaintiff's motion is denied as to Request Nos. 5-8; and Plaintiff's motion is granted as to Request Nos. 1-4 and 9-12 (as detailed in this order). (Kastilahn, A)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/30/2014 ORDERING 102 that plaintiff shall submit a revised privilege log identifying only those documents for which it is asserting work-product protection. The log shall identify each document w ith a Bates number and shall provide sufficient detail to enable the court to determine why a privilege is asserted as to each document. Plaintiff shall also deliver a second CD containing only those documents for which it is asserting work-product p rotection and which are assigned Bates numbers that correlate to the documents on the privilege log. Both the privilege log and the CD shall be delivered to the undersigned's chambers no later than 12:00 PM on 2/5/2014. Failure to abide by this order will result in a denial of plaintiffs motion to quash.(Reader, L)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/2/2013. Plaintiff's 102 Motion to Quash or Modify Subpoenas Hearing is CONTINUED to 12/18/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC). Parties directed to comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 251. This includes but is not limited to requirement that they meet and confer and file Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement. (Marciel, M)
October 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 94 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/22/13 GRANTING Plaintiff leave until and including 10/28/13 to electronically file its proposed Third Amended Complaint. Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be electronically filed not later than 30 days after Plaintiff files its Third Amended Complaint. (Meuleman, A)
September 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/4/13 re 62 Judgment, 90 USCA Order ORDERING Status Conference set for 10/28/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the Status Conference. (Meuleman, A)
February 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER denying 71 Motion for Attorney Fees signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/6/12. (Matson, R)
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 7/15/2011 ORDERING Plaintiff's CWA claims are barred by 33:1365(b)(1)(B) and are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Because of this ruling, the Court lacks supplemental jurisdiction over pltf's state claims, and those claims are DISMISSED. This action shall be closed. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
February 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/10/11: The supplemental brief shall be filed no later than March 7, 2011. Any response brief shall be filed no later than March 14, 2011. (Kaminski, H)
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/26/11 ORDERING dfts' letter request for clarification 44 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/14/2011 ORDERING Defendants' motion for protective order 23 ,is GRANTED, and dfts' 38 request for a temporary stay, is GRANTED. All discovery in this federal action is STAYED. Disc overy may not be undertaken by any party until further order of the court. Nothing in this order precludes CSPA from requesting to informally join/assist with state authorities to conduct inspections pertinent to the state actions referenced in this order, as such inspections in the pending/resolved state actions may be scheduled. (Reader, L)
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/04/10 ORDERING that dfts are GRANTED an extension of time in which to file responsive declarations, from the DTSC and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board representatives only, to 01/06/11. No further extensions will be granted. (Benson, A.)
December 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/27/10 ORDERING that Defts may file responsive declarations from the DTSC and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board representatives only, by 12/30/10. No further filings will be accepted in regard to the pending motions. (Owen, K)
November 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/23/10 GRANTING Plaintiff leave to file Second Amended Complaint. Due December 10, 2010.(Williams, D)
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STANDING 251 STIPULATED ORDER signed by Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/23/10. (Williams, D) Modified on 11/24/2010 (Williams, D).
November 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Amend the Complaint signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/9/2010. Plt has ten days leave from the date on which this order is filed to file the amended complaint attached to its motion.(Duong, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Represented By: Andrew L. Packard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chico Scrap Metal, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Scott, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: George Scott, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?