Thomas v. Mo, et al.,
Nelson Louis Thomas |
Steve Mo, R. L. Andreasen, Joseph Bick, Nadim Khouri, B. Collon and P. Pinkerton |
2:2010cv01237 |
May 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 USCA MANDATE re 16 NOTICE of APPEAL by Nelson Louis Thomas. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/18/11 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 20 USCA ORDER for 16 Notice of Appeal filed by plaintiff Nelson Louis Thomas: this Appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction (Marciel, M) |
Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/28/2011 ORDERING that pltf's amended cmplt is DISMISSED; and pltf has 30 days to file a second amended cmplt. (Yin, K) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/19/2010 ORDERING that pltf's cmplt is DISMISSED; pltf has 30 days to file an amended cmplt; the clerk to send pltf a civil rights form; pltf's 10 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED; and dfts need not take any further action until instructed to do so by the court. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.