Meador v. Ruble et al
| Gordon D Meador |
| D. Ruble, - Summerhill, Isu and High Desert State Prison |
| 2:2010cv01255 |
| May 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/1/2010 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED w/ prejudice and the clerk to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/3/2010 ORDERING pltf to SHOW CAUSE in writing, w/in 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/30/2010 DENYING pltf's 7 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/2010 ORDERING pltf to SHOW CAUSE in writing, w/in 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to resolve fees.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/10 ORDERING Pltf to submit a complete IFP application or the appropriate filing fee within 30 days of this order. Clerk directed to send new IFP application. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
