Alfaro v. Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment et al
Mika Christina Alfaro |
Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment and Regina Rogers |
2:2010cv01258 |
May 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Morrison C. England |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/5/2010 ORDERING that The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 21, 2010, are ADOPTED; Plaintiff's 2 6 application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the initial filing fee of $350.00 within twenty-one days from the date of this order. If plaintiff fails to pay the fee within this specified time, the clerk of court is directed to close this file. (Duong, D) |
Filing 4 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/21/10 RECOMMENDING that the 2 Motion to Proceed IFP be denied; pltf be provided 21 days to pay the initial filing fee of $350.00. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due with 14 days of being served. (Owen, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/25/10 ORDERING pltf to submit within 21 days of the date of this order, either a completed application in support of her request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee; the clerk is directed to send pltf a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Carlos, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.