Nunez et al v. U.S. Bank National Association
| Jose Nunez and Cesar J Nunez |
| U.S. Bank National Association |
| 2:2010cv01276 |
| May 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/13/10, DISMISSING with prejudice Plaintiffs pled TILA claims for damages and rescission; Plaintiffs remaining state claims are remanded to the San Joaquin County Superior Court in California; the federal Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant on Plaintiffs TILA rescission and damages claims. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D) .
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/26/2010 RECOMMENDING that 10 defendant's motion to dismiss, be granted with prejudice, and that the court decline to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiffs' state law claims. Objecitons due 14 days after being served with these F & R's; Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/22/2010 ORDERING the 7/29/2010 hearing on the motion to dismiss filed 5/27/2010 is vacated; and the motion is submitted on the record.(Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
