Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Donald M Burton |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2010cv01279 |
| May 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/22/13 GRANTING 31 Motion for Attorney Fees. Counsel for plaintiff is awarded $12,784.80. Commissioner is directed to pay fee forthwith and remit to plaintiff the remainder if his withheld benefits. Upon receipt, counsel shall reimburse plaintiff in the amount of $6,000.00 previously paid by the government under the EAJA. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/13 ORDERING the Court acknowledges Defendant's notice of withdrawal and approves the parties' joint stipulation. Defendant's motion to stay 33 is withdrawn, and the Court orders that Defendant's time for filing her response to Plaintiff's petition for approval of attorney's fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) is extended up to and including November 20, 2013. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/12 APPROVING and AUTHORIZING Attorney's Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 USC Section 2412(d). (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/13/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 21 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's 23 cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED. This case is REMANDED with the direction to award plaintiff benefits from 7/1/2003 through 1/20/2009. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/13/10: Plaintiff shall show good cause in writing, within fourteen days after this order is filed, for failing to file a consent or request for reassignment form. Prompt filing of a completed form will be deemed full compliance with this order. Plaintiff's second request for extension of time for service of process is granted 12 , and service of process effected on September 29, 2010 is deemed timely. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2010 GRANTING 9 Motion for Extension of Time; and the United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs no later than 20 days from the date on which this order is filed. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/25/2010 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 3 request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigned's sch eduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to theUnited States Marshal a comp leted summons, four copies of the complaint, and a copy of thescheduling order. Within five days after such submission, plaintiff shall file a notice advising the court of the date upon which the documents were submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (cc USM) (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald M Burton | |
| Represented By: | Ana Molleda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
