Marshall v. Meadows et al
| Granville H. Marshall, Jr. |
| Hal Meadows and Banner Lassen Medical Center |
| 2:2010cv01286 |
| May 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/07/12 recommending that defendant Banner Lassen's 05/19/11 motion to dismiss 38 be granted in part; Defendant Hal Meadows 05/20/11 motion to strike 43 be denied as m oot; Defendant Hal Meadows 05/20/11 motion to dismiss 45 be granted in part; Plaintiff's claims based upon alleged violation of federal law be dismissed with prejudice; The court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims; Plaintiff's state law claims be dismissed without prejudice under 28 USC 1367(c)(3); and this action be closed. MOTIONS 38 , 43 , 45 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/20/11 DENYING the 47 Motion to Continue; pltf's opposition or statement of non-opposition to 38 43 45 Motions to Strike or Dismiss due by 7/5/2011; dft's replies due by 7/15/2011; the hearing of dfts pending motions on June 24, 2011 is vacated. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/15/11, ORDERING that 6 Defendant Banner Lassen's motion to strike is DENIED as moot. Defendant Banner Lassen's 10 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Defendant Meadows' 17 motion for a more definite statement is DENIED as moot. Defendant Meadows' 17 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint 1 is DISMISSED; and plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of this order to file a first amended complaint. If Defendant Meadows or Defendant Banner Lassen is named as a defendant in any amended complaint plaintiff elects to file, that defendant shall respond to the pleading within 30 days after it is filed and served. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/6/2010. Plaintiff's 22 Request to take leave from Court is GRANTED in part. On or before 9/3/2010, plaintiff shall file and serve Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Banner Lassen Me dical's Motions to Stirke and to Dismiss and defendant Meadows' Motion to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement. Defendants' Replies, if any shall be filed and served on or before 9/13/2010. Defendants' Motions to 6 Strike and 10 17 to Dismiss Hearing is CONTINUED to 9/24/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD). Any party, may appear telephonically at Hearing. Status Conference set for 10/1/2010 is VACATED and parties are relieved from obligation to file Status Reports. Court's 19 Order to Show Cause is MOOT and DISCHARGED. Defendant Meadows shall re-serve his Motion to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement upon plaintiff by mail and file Proof of Service. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/28/10 ORDERING that within 14 days after this order is served, a declaration under penalty of perjury showing good cause for his failure to file a certificate of service indicating the date and manner of service of the courts June 2, 2010 order upon each defendant.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER of RECUSAL signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/10 ORDERING that Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison is recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
