Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff's Department et al
| Deborah Lenore Bodge |
| Trinity County Sheriff's Department, Trinity County Narcotic Task Force, Royce Grossman, Trinity County Jail, James Woodward, Trinity County District Attorney's Office, Eric Hereford and James - Woods |
| 2:2010cv01319 |
| May 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Trinity |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/17/12 RECOMMENDING that defendant's 22 Motion to Dismiss be granted and that all other motions be denied as moot. Objections to these F&Rs due within 14 days; motions referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/2/11 ORDERING that plaintiff may file further briefing in opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days of the date of this order; and defendant may file a reply within 10 days after service of any further briefing by plaintiff, after which time the motion to dismiss will stand submitted. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/1/11 ORDERING that the Scheduling Conference set for 9/8/11, is VACATED pending resolution of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/14/11, ORDERING the Clerk to issue a summons, undersigned's new case documents, and an order setting this matter for an initial scheduling conference. The Clerk shall send plaintiff the sum mons, one USM-285 forms, and a copy of the amended complaint. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the summons and shall submit to the USM with the required documents. Within 20 days of the date of this order, plaint iff shall file a notice indicating that the documents required have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. (Kastilahn, A) (cc: USM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/29/11 ORDERING that The 9 findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2011, are adopted in full. All defendants, except defendant Grossman, are dismissed with prejudice. This action proceeds against defendant Grossman only on plaintiff's claim that he obtained and executed a search warrant that was not based on probable cause. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/26/11 RECOMMENDING that all dfts, except dft Grossman, be dismissed w/ prejudice and that this action proceed against dft Grossman only on plf's claim that he obtained and executed a search warrant that was not based on probably cause. Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 14 days; referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/29/10 ORDERING that the pltf may file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 3 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/22/10. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
