Brown v. Perez, et al
| Ronnie O. Brown |
| M. Perez, J. Gaupel and Hill |
| 2:2010cv01323 |
| May 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kern |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/04/10 ORDERING Clerk of the Court to assign a district judge; RECOMMENDING that 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be Dismissed without prejudice; Objections to F&R due within 21 days; referred to U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb, (WBS). The new case number is 2:10-cv-1323 WBS KJN (PC) (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 5 motion to compel is DENIED; pltf to submit, w/in 21 days, an affidavit to procceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application (nonprisoner). (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/04/10 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk, or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
