Attebery v. Uhls et al
| Robert Attebery |
| Louis Uhls, Jim Uhl and Fenocchio Revocable Trust |
| 2:2010cv01341 |
| May 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/31/12 ORDERING that for the reasons just stated, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute and for Sanctions 22 is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/1812, ORDERING that Mr. Briggs shall, no later than 30 days from the filing date of this order, reimburse defendants' counsel for the fees and costs incurred preparing for and attending the settlement conference, in the total amount of $583.50. Within 14 days thereafter, Mr.Briggs shall file with the Clerk an affidavit stating that he paid the sum out of his personal funds, and will not bill his client or make it the responsibility of his client as attorney's fees or costs. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/17/2011 ORDERING that Jeffery Briggs to show cause in writing no later than 11/28/2011, why he should not be sanctioned for violation of the Pretrial Scheduling Order, and for vio lation of Rule 16(f)(1)(A) and (C) of the FRCP and Local Rules 110 & 182(f). Mr. Briggs shall state in his filing whether he requests a hearing on the matter. Additionally, defendants' counsel shall submit to the court by close of business Monday, 11/21/2011, a declaration stating his hourly billing rate and the number of hours expended on behalf of defendants preparing for and attending the settlement conference which Mr. Briggs failed to attend.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
13
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 6/1/11: All discovery shall be completed BY 6/15/2012. Designation of Expert Witnesses is due BY 8/15/2012. Plaintiff's Dispositive Motions shall be filed BY 10/18/2012, d efendant's opposition to plaintiff's motion and defendant's cross-motion, if any, shall be filed BY 11/8/2012, plaintiff's reply and opposition shall be filed BY 11/21/2012, and defendant's reply shall be filed BY 12/6/2012. Hearing on such motions shall be on 12/13/2012, at 2:00 p.m. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/21/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. A joint final pretrial conf statement is due BY 1/31/2013. Trial briefs are due BY 2/7/2013. Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed BY 1/31/2013, oppositions must be filed BY 2/7/2013, and any reply must be filed BY 2/14/2013. A Jury Trial is SET for 4/15/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) befo re Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., and is estimated to last four days. A Settlement Conference is SET for 9/22/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Confidential settlement conference statements are due not LATER than 9/15/2011. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/21/10: Defendants have an extension of time up to and including November 15, 2010 to file a responsive pleading. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
