Johnson v. PD Hotel Associates, LLC, et al
| Roosevelt Johnson |
| PD Hotel Associates, LLC and Dow PRE II, LLC |
| 2:2010cv01407 |
| June 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/2011 ORDERING 18 Settlement Conference set before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd, on 10/20/2011 at 10:00 AM. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE AND CORRESPONDING PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES TO FACILITATE SETTLEMENT signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/7/11 ORDERING Expert Witness disclosures due by 1/13/12; Discovery completion 3/7/12; Dispositive Motions filed by 4/18/12; Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/22/12 at 11:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 7/30/12 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
11
RELATED CASE ORDER 6 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/23/2010. Action denominated 2:10-CV-1407 JAM DAD shall be REASSIGNED to Judge Mendez and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all Further Proceedings. Any date currently set in reassigned case ONLY are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, caption on documents filed shall be shown as 2:10-CV-1407 JAM DAD. Clerk to make appropriate adjustment in assignment of action. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
