Perez v. Roe et al
Juan Martinez Perez |
W Roe, City of Isleton and Ron Jole |
2:2010cv01423 |
June 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Morrison C. England |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER 23 for Extension of Time signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/1/2011. The time for defendants Roe and Jose to respond to plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is EXTENDED to 2/8/2011. Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report by 2/28/2011. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/14/10: The time in which Defendants Roe and Jole may answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended from December 14, 2010 to January 25, 2010. The time in which the Parties are to submit a joint status report is extended from December 31, 2010 to January 31, 2011. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/19/10: The time in which Defendants Roe and Jole may answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended from October 15, 2010 to December 14, 2010. Joint Status report that includes the Rule 26(f) discovery plan is extended from within 60 days of service of the complaint on any party. Case Referred to VDRP. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.