Mojarro v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
| Yolanda A. Mojarro |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A,, California Reconveyance Company, Long Beach Mortgage Company and Washington Mutual |
| 2:2010cv01439 |
| June 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Morrison C. England |
| Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/21/2010. It is ORDERED that the hearing date of 9/22/2010 on defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss and the Status Conference currently set for 10/20/2010 are VA CATED; it is also RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b) based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute action, defendants' 9 Motion to Dismiss be denied as moot, and Clerk be directed to close this case. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party my file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/27/2010 ORDERING that the hearing on Dfts' 9 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 9/22/2010. Pltf shall SHOW CAUSE, no later than 9/8/2010, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file an opposition to the pending motion. Pltf shall file an opposition by 9/8/2010. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
