Hallstrom v. Aqua Flora, Inc. et al
Zachary Hallstrom |
Aqua Flora, Inc. and King Bio, Inc. |
2:2010cv01459 |
June 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Frank C. Damrell |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER RE AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION 39 TO CONTINUE THE FINAL PRE-TRIAL, signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/23/11. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 9/14/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/2/11: Plaintiff's request for a trial by jury is GRANTED. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/31/2011 VACATING plaintiff's 33 Motion to Compel Discovery. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/4/11 re 29 ORDERING that all discovery shall be completed by March 25, 2011. All other dates remain as previously set. (Duong, D) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/15/2010 ORDERING that defendants' 10 Rule 12(b)(1) and 9 Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss are DENIED.(Duong, D) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION and ORDER 7 for Extension of Time signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 7/13/2010. Defendant King Bio Inc. shall file its Response to Complaint up to and including 7/26/2010. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.