Vaden v. Dickenson et al
| Ernest Lee Vaden |
| Kathleen L. Dickenson and Joseph Gonzales |
| 2:2010cv01676 |
| June 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/15/11 ORDERING that plaintiffs in forma pauperis status is REVOKED for purposes of appeal. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ernest Lee Vaden signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/7/2011. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/8/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
