Birrell v. Knauf et al
Plaintiff: David Wesley Birrell
Defendant: Keith Harlan Knauf, Dan Clanton and Vimal J. Singh
Case Number: 2:2010cv01707
Filed: July 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/19/14 DENYING 121 Motion for Relief from Judgment. (Manzer, C)
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/07/14 ordering plaintiff's motion for leave to amend 106 is denied. Motion for relief from final judgment 111 is denied. (Plummer, M)
September 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 102 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/10/2013 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 75 , 76 motion for summary judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
March 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 03/04/13 ordering plaintiff's motion for an order deeming matters admitted 80 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for issuance of subpoenas duces tecum 84 is denied. Plaintiff's motio n pursuant to Rule 56(d) 88 is denied. Plaintiff may file an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the date of this order. Defendants may file a reply within 20 days after service of plaintiff's opposition. (Plummer, M)
October 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/15/2012 ORDERING that defendants' 67 motion for a protective order is DENIED; plaintiff's 61 motion to compel is GRANTED; defendants shall serve responses to plaintiff's o utstanding discovery requests within 30 days; plaintiff's request for monetary sanctions is DENIED; plaintiff's 63 motion to appear telephonically or in person is DENIED as unnecessary; the parties may conduct discovery through 1/15/2013 ; within 90 days of the discovery cut-off date, defendants shall file either a notice of their intention to stand on their current 75 motion for summary judgment, or an amended motion; and plaintiff's opposition due within 30 days after service of defendants' notice to stand on the current motion or amended motion. (Yin, K)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/10/12 GRANTING 62 Motion for Extension of time. The parties may conduct discovery in accord with the courts June 7, 2011, scheduling order until July 6, 2012. All dispositive motions shall be filed within 90 days after this date.(Dillon, M)
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/12/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 57 motion to stay discovery is DENIED; plaintiff's 56 unopposed motion for an extension of the discovery cut-off date is GRANTED; Discovery due by 5/6/2012; All Dispositive Motions due within 90 days of the discovery cut-off date; and plaintiff's 54 motion for leave to depose incarcerated witnesses is DENIED. (Yin, K)
August 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/10/11 denying 40 plaintiff's motion to compel and denying 42 plaintiff's motion to extend the discovery cut-off date. (Plummer, M)
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/07/11 DENYING 35 Motion for Reconsideration; AFFIRMING 32 Order. No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Michel, G)
June 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 06/22/11 DENYING 36 Motion for leave to take depositions, without prejudice. (Michel, G)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 06/06/11 ordering plaintiff's motion for appointment of a neutral person 27 is denied. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a further amended complaint 23 is denied. The clerk of the court shall strike the proposed second amended complaint filed on 03/03/11 from the docket. This action proceeds on the first amended complaint filed on 1/07/11 15 . (Plummer, M)
February 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/23/11 denying 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
January 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/20/11 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one copy of the amended complaint; and Within 30 days, plaintiff shall completethe attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court: The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; and Four copies of the endorsed amended complaint. (Becknal, R)
January 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/13/11 ORDERING that plaintiff may amend once as of right without leave of court; and 14 Motion to Amend the Complaint is DENIED as unnecessary. (Dillon, M)
July 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/13/10 ORDERING the director of the CDC to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of David Wesley Birrell to the clerk until the balance of $350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial, CDC Prisoner Payment Orders )(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Birrell v. Knauf et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Wesley Birrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Harlan Knauf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dan Clanton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vimal J. Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?