Brown v. Bank of America N.A. et al

Brown v. Bank of America N.A. et al

Plaintiff:	George A. Brown
Defendant:	Bank of America N.A.
Case Number:	2:2010cv01762
Filed:	July 8, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Placer
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit:	Foreclosure
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 1, 2010	Filing 14 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/1/2010 ORDERING that 8 the hearing date of 10/6/2010 on dfts's Motion to Dismiss is VACATED; and the status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently se t for hearing on 11/17/2010 is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b), based on pltf's failure to prosecute the action; dft's motion to dismiss be denied as moot; and the Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
August 10, 2010	Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/10/10 ORDERING the hearing on dft's motion to dismiss is CONTINUED to 10/6/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; pltf SHALL SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING no later tha n9/22/10 why sanctions should not be imposted for failure to timely file an opposition or non-opposition to the pending motion; dft may file a reply to pltf's opposition, if any, on or before 9/29/10. (Carlos, K)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 1, 2010

Filing 14 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/1/2010 ORDERING that 8 the hearing date of 10/6/2010 on dfts's Motion to Dismiss is VACATED; and the status (pretrial scheduling) conference currently se t for hearing on 11/17/2010 is VACATED; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to FRCP 41(b), based on pltf's failure to prosecute the action; dft's motion to dismiss be denied as moot; and the Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

August 10, 2010

Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/10/10 ORDERING the hearing on dft's motion to dismiss is CONTINUED to 10/6/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; pltf SHALL SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING no later tha n9/22/10 why sanctions should not be imposted for failure to timely file an opposition or non-opposition to the pending motion; dft may file a reply to pltf's opposition, if any, on or before 9/29/10. (Carlos, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Bank of America N.A. et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America N.A.
Represented By:	Brett Brandon Goodman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: George A. Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?