Ibbotson v. Aurora Loan Services et al
Nancy A. Ibbotson |
Aurora Loan Services, Homecomings Financial Network, Inc., Quality Loan Service Corporation, Moneywell Mortgage Group and Monty Maxwell |
2:2010cv01857 |
July 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Frank C. Damrell |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/2/10 ORDERING that the hearing date of 11/10/10 is vacated. Hearing on defendants' motions is continued to 12/15/10 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26; Plaintiff shall file opposition, i f any, to the motions no later than 12/1/10. Failure to file opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in submission of the motions on the papers and a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Becknal, R) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/24/10: 6 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to add plaintiff to the service list. The hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss 5 currently set for September 10, 2010 is HEREBY VACATED. Defendant shall re-notice its motion before Magistrate Judge Mueller. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.