Ramirez v. Martel
| Ricardo Gil Ramirez |
| Mike Martel |
| 2:2010cv01906 |
| July 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/22/11 recommending that the petition be denied. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/4/2011 ORDERING that the parties have 21 days to provide simultaneous supplemental briefing, in light of the very recent decision noted in this order, demonstrating why the instant petition should not be dismissed; and respondent's 13 motion to dismiss is VACATED w/out prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/20/10 granting 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The petition is dismissed in the instant case with leave granted, within 28 days for petitioner to file an amended petition challenging only the 2007 parole denial; The clerk of the court is directed to: Open an additional and separate 28 USC 2254 action for petitioner (2:10-cv-1906 GGH HC). Assign the same district judge and magistrate judge to whom the instant case is assigned and make appropr iate adjustment in the assignment of 2254 cases to compensate for such assignment. File and docket a copy of this order in the new separate habeas action. Place copy of the petition and application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner filed o n 06/07/10, and a copy of this order in the additional separate file opened for this petitioner. Send petitioner a copy of this order both in this case and in the newly opened case. The petition in the newly opened case is also dismissed and petiti oner is granted 28 days from the filing of this order in the new habeas action to file an amended petition challenging only his 2008 parole denial. Failure to file an amended petition in each or both cases will result in a recommendation that one or both petitions be dismissed.(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramirez v. Martel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ricardo Gil Ramirez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Mike Martel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
