(TEMP) Lacondeguy v. Adapa et al
Albert Lacondeguy |
First Advantage Corporation, Jagdish Ambalal Patel MD Doing business as Tracy Occupational Medical Center, Venkataramana Adapa, John Burleson Womack, Ian Thomas Pulliam and YRC, Inc. |
2:2010cv01917 |
July 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F Brennan |
John A Mendez |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
29 U.S.C. § 185 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/23/2011 ORDERING that this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California for the County of San Joaquin. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Remand to State Court by Albert Lacondeguy. (Ellis, Albert) |
Filing 25 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Albert Lacondeguy. (Ellis, Albert) |
Filing 24 MINUTE ORDER: re #23 Status Report - GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the parties shall file an updated joint status report on or before May 20, 2011. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 23 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Albert Lacondeguy. (Ellis, Albert) |
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER: re #21 Status Report - The parties shall file an updated joint status report on or before April 15, 2011. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 21 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Albert Lacondeguy. (Ellis, Albert) |
Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER: The parties shall file a joint status report on or before March 18, 2011. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/11/11: Plaintiff's statutory negligence claim is dismissed with prejudice. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 18 PROPOSED ORDER re #9 MOTION to DISMISS by First Advantage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 (Proposed Order)(Wahlquist, Duke) Modified on 2/11/2011 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 17 ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii: Due to the elevation of Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller to the position of District Judge, this action is temporarily assigned to *Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan*. (Donati, J) |
Filing 16 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/31/2010 ORDERING that Defendant's #9 Motion to Dismiss (converted to a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings) is GRANTED. The claim captioned "Negligence of Medical Review Officer" is dismissed, with leave to amend the statutory negligence component consistent with the Court's order as discussed above. The common law negligence component of the above claim is dismissed with prejudice. The claim captioned "Fraud & Interference With Contract" is dismissed with prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint against Defendant, he must do so within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order.(Duong, D) |
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER: The hearing on the motion(s) now calendared for September 15, 2010 are ordered submitted without appearance and without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230 (g).If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 14 PRO HAC VICE ORDER re #12 Pro Hac Vice Application, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/8/10. Added Attorney D. Faye Caldwell, PHV for Dft First Advantage Corporation. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 13 REPLY by First Advantage Corporation to RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to DISMISS. (Wahlquist, Duke) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200029353 $180.00 fbo D. Faye Caldwell by Nationwide Legal Inc. on 9/8/2010. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 12 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by First Advantage Corporation for attorney D. Faye Caldwell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Wahlquist, Duke) |
Filing 11 REQUEST for Dismissal by Albert Lacondeguy re #5 MOTION to DISMISS filed by YRC, Inc.. (Ellis, Albert) |
Filing 10 OPPOSITION by Albert Lacondeguy to #5 MOTION to DISMISS, #9 MOTION to DISMISS. (Attachments: #1 Dismissal of YRC)(Ellis, Albert) |
Filing 9 MOTION to DISMISS by First Advantage Corporation. Attorney Wahlquist, Duke F. added. Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(Wahlquist, Duke) Modified on 8/24/2010 (Zignago, K.). |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by YRC, Inc. re #5 MOTION to DISMISS, #6 Notice - Other,. (Shadi, Sabrina) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by YRC, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (Shadi, Sabrina) |
Filing 6 NOTICE YRC, Inc.'s Amended Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 9/15/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge John A. Mendez. by YRC, Inc. re #5 MOTION to DISMISS. (Shadi, Sabrina) |
Filing 5 MOTION to DISMISS by YRC, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 8/24/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of YRC's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6), #2 Exhibit A to YRC's Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #3 Exhibit B to YRC's Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities)(Shadi, Sabrina) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by YRC, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (Shadi, Sabrina) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Page Limits, #3 VDRP Form) (Williams, D) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL by YRC, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shadi, Sabrina) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200028093 $350.00 fbo YRC, Inc. by Sabrina L Shadi on 7/20/2010. (Williams, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.