Vatalaro v. Microstrategy Incorporated
| Todd Vatalaro |
| Microstrategy Incorporated |
| 2:2010cv02015 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/16/12. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) FRCP. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/1/2012 RESETTING the Discovery Deadline to 6/15/2012; RESETTING the Dispositive Motion Deadline to 6/27/2012, Dispositive Motions, if any, shall be heard on 7/25/2012 at 9:30 AM; RESETTING the Final Pretrial Conference to 9/7/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; RESETTING the Jury Trial to 10/15/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/04/12 ORDERING that the 19 Stipulated Protective Order is GRANTED with the following modifications: the substantive standards set forth by the Ninth Circuit for filing documents under seal a re found in Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Assn., 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) and Phillips v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210 (9th Cir. 2002). Any confidential material filed with the court, sealed or otherwise, will not be returned at the conclusion of the litigation. Procedurally, the parties must comply with E. D. Local Rules 141 and 141.1 regarding the sealing of documents. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/14/2011 ORDERING 13 Motion to Quash is GRANTED without prejudice; both parties' requests for sanctions are DENIED; plaintiff shall formulate non-redundant discovery requests to defendan t based on the discovery requested in the subpoenas; parties shall meet and confer to further alleviate the necessity of serving third party subpoenas as outlined in this order; should either party bring a renewed motion related to the instant discovery, the parties shall meet and confer to file a joint statement in compliance with Local Rule 251. (Waggoner, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vatalaro v. Microstrategy Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Todd Vatalaro | |
| Represented By: | Robin Kerry Perkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Microstrategy Incorporated | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
