Johnson v. Da Costa, et al
Plaintiff: Scott N. Johnson
Defendant: Carlos M. Da Costa and Claudina M. Da Costa
Case Number: 2:2010cv02020
Filed: July 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/16/2011 DISMISSING CASE 26 with prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 03/21/11 ORDERING that the Dispositional Documents disposing of the case be filed no later that 30 days from the effective date of this Order; all hearing dates are VACATED. Failure to comply with this ORDER may be grounds for the imposition of Sanctions on any and all Counsel or Parties who Contributed to the violation of this Order.(Williams, D)
January 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/20/2011 re 20 ORDERING that Carlos M. Da Costa and Claudina M. Da Costa shall henceforth be listed on the docket as pro se parties. Counsel is ORDERED to release all client papers and property t o clients within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, including correspondences, pleadings, deposition transcripts, exhibits, physical evidence, expert reports, and other items reasonably necessary to the clients' representation, whether the clients have paid for them or not. Counsel is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order and the 20 order granting the motion to withdraw on Carlos M. Da Costa and Claudina M. Da Costa. No later than 45 days from the date of this order, defendants SHALL inform the court whether they have retained alternative counsel or whether they instead wish to proceed in pro se. If defendants proceed in pro se, this case will assigned to a Magistrate Judge. If defendants retain alternative counsel, the court will set a further status conference at that time.(Duong, D)
November 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/2/2010 ORDERING 9 that Defendants Carlos M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust; Claudina M. Da Costa Individually and as Trustee, and their Successor Trustees, of the Da Costa Living Trust shall have until 11/16/2010 to respond to complaint. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Da Costa, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carlos M. Da Costa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Claudina M. Da Costa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott N. Johnson
Represented By: Scott N. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?