Gleason v. Glasscock, et al
| Patrick Gleason |
| Anne Glasscock and The California Horse Racing Board |
| 2:2010cv02030 |
| July 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/29/12; For the reasons stated above, Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED without leave to amend as to Plaintiffs First Cause of Action, and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remand this case to the originating state court, the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento, for final adjudication. IT IS SO ORDERED. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/5/11 ORDERING the 4/5/11 order to show cause is discharged; Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to serve Glasscock is granted; Plaintiff has until 6/17/11 to serve Glasscock and fi le a proof of such service with the court; and Failure of plaintiff to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that defendant Glasscock and/or this action be dismissed for failure to follow court orders, for failure to effect service of process within the time prescribed and/or for lack of prosecution.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/4/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before April 25, 2011, why defendant Glasscock should not be dismissed for failure to effect service of process wit hin the time prescribed by Rule 4(m). Failure of plaintiff to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that defendant Glasscock and/or this action be dismissed for failure to follow court orders, for failure to effect service of process within the time prescribed by Rule 4(m), and/or for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b). (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/31/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 22 ADOPTED; dfts CHRB's motion to dismiss 7 is GRANTED; dft CHRB's motion to strike 7 is DENIED AS MOOT; and dft California Horse Racing Board is DISMISSED from this action. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/28/11, RECOMMENDING that Defendant CHRB's 7 motion to dismiss be granted; Defendant CHRB's 7 motion to strike be denied as moot; and Defendant CHRB be dismis sed from this action. Motion referred to Judge England. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Any reply to the objections shall be filed within seven days after service of the objections. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/5/2011 ORDERING 7 Motion Hearing reset for 2/16/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff Show Cause in writing due by 2/2/2011; pltf shall file an opposition to motion, or a statement of non-opposition due by 2/2/2011; the CA Horse Racing Board may file a reply to pltf's opposition, if any due by 2/9/2011. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/2010 GRANTING plaintiff's 12 Request for continuance. The 7 Motion to Dismiss Hearing is RE-SCHEDULED for 1/12/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB). Plaintiff shall file an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Motion no later than 12/29/2010. California Horse Racing Board may file a Reply to Opposition, if any, on or before 1/5/2011. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/10: HEARING as to 7 MOTION to DISMISS continued to 11/24/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than November 10, 2010, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motions. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
