Andoh v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
| John Andoh |
| City of South Lake Tahoe, South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Russell Liles |
| 2:2010cv02053 |
| August 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/21/11 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED w/ prejudice per Rule 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/16/2011 ORDERING 23 that any claim for lost wages and loss of earning capacity as a result of the action or inaction as alleged in the Complaint be STRICKEN. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/24/11, ORDERING that third party in interest www.johnandoh.com's motion to appear anonymously and to quash the subpoena plaintiff served on Google, Inc., to the extent the subpoena relates to www.johnandoh.com, is GRANTED. To the extent the subpoena plaintiff served on Google, Inc. relates to www.johnandoh.com, Google shall not provide any responses to that subpoena relating to www.johnandoh.com. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order via email on Google, Inc., c/o Google Legal Support, at legal-support@google.com. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
